Music Player

FATWA OF KUFR ON DEOBANDI MAULVIS


The Fatwa of Kufr was issued on the insolent Deobandi Maulvis by the 'Ulamaa of Harmain Tayyibain: Makkah Madeena Shareef.

This fatwa was issued in 1320 A.H (1900 AD) by the Saliheen 'Ulamaa of Haram Shareef and the great holy places before the Saudi Wahaabi Najdi forced themselves into power.

The subject that has been given the Islamic Sentence of Kufr are those insolent and degrading statements written by the Deobandi Maulvis who have clearly insulted the Holy Prophet's (sallalahu alaihi wasallam) dignity and character.
The following statements have been thoroughly investigated and issued with the Fatwa of Kufr.
1. Statement from the book 'Hifzul Imaan' stating that the Holy Prophet's knowledge of the unseen (Ilme-e-Ghaib) is the same as Zain or Amar or children, madmen, animals and four-legged beasts, written by Ashraf Ali Thanvi.

2. Statements from the book 'Bahrain-e-Qatia' stating that Saram and Malikul Maut's knowledge is more than the Holy Prophet's, and proof exists for this for Satan but not for the Holy Prophet. Also it is not Shirk to believe this for Satan but it is Shirk to believe the same for the Holy Prophet (sallalahu alaihi wasallam) written by Khalil Ahmed Ambethwi and certified and embossed by Rashid Ahmed Gangohi, also the same agreement in his book 'Fatawa-e-Rashidia'.

3. Statement from the book 'Tahzeerun Naaz' stating that there is possibility of there being another Prophet after the Holy Prophet (sallalahu alaihi wasallam), written by Qassim Nanotwi.
The above mentioned books were very carefully scrutinized involving years of investigation, this being 30 years for 'Tahzeerun', 16 years for 'Baharain-e-Qatia' and over 1 year for 'Hifzul Imaan'. During this time letters were written and messages were sent asking the Deobani Maulvis to either give valid reasons or renounce their statements and perform Tauba (ask for forgiveness). But no answers were ever given and so, therefore, Imam Ahmed Raza Khan had but no other alternative but to issue Ashraf Ali Thanvi, Rashid Ahmed Gangohi, Khalil Ahmed Ambethwi, and Qassim Nanotwi with the Fatwa of Kufr (Sentence of Disbelief) clearly defining that these Maulvis are Kafirs.
This Fatwa was presented to the great 'Ulamaa and Islamic Jurists of Harmain Tayyibain to ask for their opinion. Thirty three 'Ulamaa of Makkah and Madeena Shareef have their verdict that these Deobandi Maulvis had definitely performed Kufr.
FATWA BY 'ULAMAA OF MAKKAH SHAREEF
The names and status of 'Ulamaa of Harmain Tayyibain that issued the Fatwa are as follows:
1. Fatwa from Ustaad-e-Harmain Saeed Shafeii.
2. Sayedul 'Ulamaa – Maulana Mufti Sheikh Ahmed Abdul Khair Mirdad.
3. Mufti Hanafia – Allama Sheikh Saleh Kamaal.
4. Mufti Sheikh Ali Bin Siddiq Kamaal.
5. Sheikhul Dalail – Mufti Muhammad Abdul Haq Mujahir Al-Babadi.
6. Mufti Sayed Ismail Khaleel – Librarian of Makkah.
7. Maulana Mufti Sheikh Umar Bin Abibakr Ba Junaid.
8. Allama Mufti Saeed Ablu Hussain Al-Mazruki.
9. Mufti Sheikh Abid bin Hussain Maaliki.
10. Mufti Ali bin Hussain Maaliki.
11. Mufti Muhammad Jamaal bin Muhammad Hussain.
12. Mufti Sheikh Asad bin Ahmad Dahan – Teacher in Haram Shareef, Makkah.
13. Mufti Shaikh Abdul Rehmaan Dahan.
14. Mufti Sheikh Muhammad Yusuf Afghani.
15. Mufti Sheikh Ahmed Maaliki Al Imdadi – Teacher at Haram and Madrassa Ahmadia in Makkah and Khalifa of Haji Imdadullah Muhaajir Makki.
16. Mufti Muhammad Yusuf Al-Khayaat.
17. Sheikh Muhammad Saleh bin Muhammad Ba-Fazi.
18. Sheikh Abdul Karim Naji Dagistani.
19. Sheikh Muhammad Saeed bin Muhammad Al-Yamani.
20. Mufti Sheikh Haamid Muhammad Al-Jadawi
FATWA BY 'ULAMAA OF MADEENA MUNAWWARA
1. Mufti Hanafia – Tajoodeen Ilyas.
2. Former Mufti of Madeena – Allama Osman bin Abdus Salaam Dagistani.
3. Sheikh-e-Maalikia – Mufti Sayed Ahmad of Algeria.
4. Mufti Khaleel bin Ibrahim Karbooti.
5. Sheikud Dalail – Mufti Sayed Muhammad Saeed.
6. Mufti Sheikh Mehboob bin Ahmad Omari.
7. Sheikhul Dalail – Mufti Sayed Abbas bin Sayed Jaleel.
8. Mufti Sheikh Omar bin Hamdaan Al-Maharasee.
9. Mufti Sayeed Hakeen Muhammad bin Muhammad Madani.
10. Mufti Shaaeiya0Allam Sayed Shareef Ahmad Barzanji.
11. Mufti Muhammad Aziz Maaliki – formerly of Tunisia.
12. Mufti Sheikh Muhammad Kiyari – Teacher at the Haram Shareef Madeena.
13. Mufti Sheikh Abdul Qadeer Taufeew – Teacher of Masjid-e-Nabawi Shareef.

Readers who are interested in looking at the complete Fatawa should read the book 'Hussamul Harmain Ala Manhar Al-Kufr Wal Main', where the original Arabic Text and its Urdu translations are given. Extracts from views of some of the above 'Ulamaa are given below.

'Ulamaa of Masjid-e-Nabwi, Mufti Sheikh Umar bin Hamdaan Al-Maharasee states:



"After studying the issues written by Ahmad Raza Khan in his fatwa to which the mentioned people have been refereed to and rejected, I have found this absolutely correct. Who are these people? Evil and apostate Gulam Ahmad Qadyani who is a dajjal of the last era and Khalil Ahmed Ambethwi and Ashraf Ali Thanvi and to these where the subject has been proven as mentioned by this great Aalim Ahmed Raza Khan. Qadyani's claim to be a prophet and Rashid Ahmed, Khalil Ahmed and Ashraf Ali's insulting statements which has lowered the dignity of the Holy Prophet (sallalahu alaihi wasallam), then there is no doubt that they are Kafirs and those who perform the act of ex ecution, it is necessary for them to give these men the sentence of death."

[Hussamul Harmain. Pages 125/126]


Mufti Sayed Ismail Khaleel – Librarian of Mecca writes:

After Salaam I hereby say that after investigation on this subject, of course Gulam Ahmad Qadyani and Rashid Ahmed Gangohi and his partners like Khalil Ahmed Ambethwi and Ashraf Ali Thanvi etc., there is no hesitation in their Kufr nor is there any question of doubt, in fact, whoever doubts their Kufr or tries to avoid calling them as Kafirs, they themselves become Kafir, and there is no hesitation in this as there is someone who tries to overthrow the religion and are rejecting the compulsory aspects of Islam to which all Muslims are united. So in Islam their names and presence sho uld not exist as it should be made clear to all illiterate and completely illiterate persons."


[Hussaamul Harmain. Pages 49/50]
Mufti Muhammad Jamaal bin Muhammad Hussain states:

"After Hamd and Salaat, I have read these wicked wanderers' statements who are now present in Jind (India) and that text is proof of these people being apostates, which has completely disgraced them and may Allah disgrace Gulam ahmed Qadyani and Rashid Ahmed Gangohi and Khalil Ahmed Ambethwi and Ashraf Ali Thanvi etc. who areopen infidels and apostates. May Allah bless and honour Hazrat Maulvi Ahmed raza Khan and be pleased with him who has performed Farz-e-Kifaya (collective Compulsory act).

[Hussaamul Harmain. Pages 77/78]

Allama Mufti Saeed Abul Hussain Marzuki states:
"… and of course Tibrani reports that Hazrat Anas (radiAllahu anhu) has narrated that "RasoolAllah (Sallalahu alaihi wasallam) has said that Allah Ta'aala keeps all Bud Mazhab people from performing Tauba until they leave their Bud Mazhab (wrong sect)" and Ibne Majah reports that Hazrat Abdullah ibne Abbas (radiAllahu anhu) narrates that the Holy Prophet (Sallalahu alaihi wasallam) has said that "Allah does not accept any deed performed by a Bud Mazhabi until he leaves his Bud Mazhab." Ibne Majah also reports that Hazrat Hufaiza (RadiAllahu Anhu) narrates a Hadith that the Holy Prophet (Sallalahu alaihi wasallam) has said that Allah Ta'a ala does not accept anything from a Bud-Mazhabi, not their Roza, not Namaaz, nor Zakaat, nor Hajj nor Umrah nor Kihad nor any compulsory act ot voluntary act and they come out of Islam like a haid is pulled out of some flour."

[Hassaamul Harmain. Pages 59/60]

The Teacher of Masjid-e-Nabwi Shareef, Sheikh Abdul Qadar Taufeeq states:
"All praise to the one Allah and Durood and Salaam to he who there is no Prophet after and to his family and followers and their Hamd and Salat as to which has been proven that relates to him (Holy Prophet sallalahu alaihi wasallam) that Gulam Ahmed Qadyani and Qassim Nanotwi and Rashid Ahmed Gangohi and Khalil Ahmed Ambethwi and Ashraf Ali Thanvi and those who are with them and all those who have been mentioned in the question, then of course this is an order of KUFR to them and the order which is given to all apostates, meaning to give them the sentence of death the go ahead and if this cannot be performed there, then it is necessary for Muslims to stay away from them and look at them with hatred on mimbars in mosques and in books and in groups etc. so that in the hope their intentions are burnt and their Kufr is openly known in the fear that their deceit does not com into the Islamic world."

[Hassaamul Harmain. Pages 157/158]

WARNING!

Readers are requested to note that, in view of the Fatwa, by not only leading Imaams and Islamic Jurists of Harmain Shareef, they MUST NOT DOUBT THE KUFR of these Maulvis of Deoband, otherwise they are exposing THEIR OWN IMAAN TO DANGER! Similar fatwa have been given by 'Ulamaa through the ages in similar cases together with the danger of disbelief in Islam for those doubting the fatwa. People are aware and accept Kufr fatwa on Gulan Ahmed Qadyani. It must be remembered that he is only one of the five named in the Fatwa. The other four are Deobandi/Tableeghi leaders and founders. Therefore anybody who still has beliefs in these Maulvis is risking his own Imaan. Any person with a neutral attitude, after reading this fatwa and what thes e Maulvis have written would definately have to accept that these Jamaats are wrong and the only correct and proper religion of Islam is that followed by the Ahle Sunnat wal Jamaat, who have unconditional love for Allah and his beloved Prophet Muhammad Sallalahu alaihi wasallam. May Allah guide us on the right path. Aameen.

24 comments:

  1. if fatwa was given from makkah and madina shareef ullama. please post soft copy of those fatwas on this page.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It was not given by this recent kingdom of saud wahabis it was given by the truth ulamas of saudi before that wahabis

      Delete
    2. however the same ulama were informed of the reality of the matter.
      in response they posed 26 questions which were answered by sheikh khalil ahmed saharanpuri in his kitaab al muhannad
      thereafter the ulama of Haramain retracted what had initially been written

      Delete
  2. Please upload the soft copy of the fatwa. Otherwise I must say : it's a fake fatwa.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. See the fatwa Husaam ul Harmaain in this link : http://www.islamimehfil.com/topic/11232-book-hassam-ul-haramain-in-urdu-english-and-arabic/

      Delete
  3. Please upload the soft copy of the fatwa. Otherwise I must say : it's a fake fatwa.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There is no need to upload softcopy to give the proof. Because your Imaan is not complete so please go and search by yourself as the books are mentioned there. Those people who have complete Imaan they know the fatwas are correct

      Delete
  4. There is so much uneasiness among the Wahabis about the birth of the Holy Prophet (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) or his Meelad that there is no mention of his birth in many of the Wahabi Masaajids. In fact, in one of their Kuthbas, the Imaam mentioned that the Muslims were worshipping idols. This was an indirect attack on shrines of the Saints and the Prophet of Allah that the Sunnis have great respect for. The Wahabis call these shrines idols! The lack of respect and love for the Prophet (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) by the Wahabi/Deobandi is clear to see.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Fatwa is correct and we suppose to agree this and i have debt with Deoband they have same beliefs as above there moulvis

    ReplyDelete
  6. They believe remembering our beloved prophet sallalu alai wa sallam in namaz is void and namaz is invalid and if any one remember ox donkey bull or wife or zina also valid and namaz will be done
    Astagfirullah how we can consider these jamyat has a Muslims we should slap on there faces

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They do not believe this.
      we (deobandis) believe it is permissible rather it is very good to remember the birth of Huzoor e Aqdas Sallalahu alaihi wa sallam as long as no haram acts are being commited during milaad.
      for example music, causing trouble, missing namaaz etc

      Delete
    2. Mr. here we are talking about Baatil and kufr aqida of your deobandis aslaaf so do you believe them as Muslims or Infidel even after reading Fatwas. Yes or No?. If yes welcone to Ahle sunnah wal jamaah if NO then you with your Aslaaf may burn in the deep Jahannam (Heel fire).

      Delete
  7. https://archive.org/stream/Al-muhannadAlaAl-mufannadaqaidUlamaDeobandByShaykhKhaleelAhmad/Al-muhannadAlaAl-mufannadShaykhKhaleelAhmadSaharanpurir.a#page/n3/mode/2up
    Everyone go to this website and you will see the truth as deobandi are true Muslim

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Are tujhe itna nhi dekha ki sb proof ke sth bata diya ki ye deobandi or wahabi ki jamaat ke kaise log hai itne proof dene ke baad bhi nhi maan nhi rahe aise logo ko kufr kaha gaya hai padho khudh ko akal hai padho smjho

      Delete
  8. Is it true or fake like current govt, Ek jhoot ko itni bar bolo ke woh sach lage.
    Bina Quran Aur hadis ke reference wali Baat par yaqin mat karu.
    Aaj Kal dhande wale maulvi ziada hai. Aur woh logo ko khush Karne ke liye, wohi batate hai jo log sunna chahte hai. Na ke woh Baat jo Quran Aur hadis exact main hai.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jis bande m sahi imam h wo Rasool Allah k khilaf ek lafz nhi manega sirf unki tarif Sunna pasand karega baat saaf h Sare fatwe sach h wo log khafir h aala hazrat haq p h hum aala hazrat ki rassi pakadke jannat jayege mere dost b wahabi h par wo log unke molvi ki baate nhi mante par h toh wohi sect m Jo haq nhi sayeed ko pakdo unke peeche chalo Rasool ka khandaan h wo beshak jannati h har sayeed

      Delete
    2. Are jhahil ye baat quran or hadees me kaisi hogi abe tujhe kuch akal hai ky ye baat kb ki hai kis duar ki hai or quran shareef ko aake kitne saal hue to ye kaise aayega or rahi ye logo ne nabi ki or allah ki gustakhi ki hai ye logo ne deen ka mazak udaya hai or imam ahmed raza ne khudh ye makka or ke logo se translate kra kr us baat ka mtlb nikla to kufr nikla or tumko itna kuch bata kr bhi akal nhi sari or ye jhoot lgra yani tum log sirf dekhawe ke mohabbat se krne wale pasand aate hai or tum allah or nabi se ky mohabbat kroge jis logo ne allah or nabi ki gustakhi ki un logo ko tum defend kr rahe ho or tum bhi mohabbat kyun kroge kyunki tum vaise logo ki aulad hai tum jaise tum log gustakhi ko kum samaj rahe ho nabi ki gustakhi yani kufr super saaf likha hua hai or takin nhi hota hai to khudh search kr lo padho imaan ko aise logo se imaan bachao tum jaise logo ko akal rahti nhi aate moo leke quran me hai ky hadees me hai tujhe khudh ilm nhi hai or aye moo leke idhar teri jali kyunki tumhare logo ki sacchai samne laye to sacchai hazam nhi hue isliye kuch bhi bakna chalo kra

      Delete
  9. Strange to see today also these wahabis and deobandis are feeling pride on thier faith and aqida even after having so much fatwas on thjer jama'at and on their Aslaaf. May Allah give hidayah to them or Aukama of Ahke sunnah now should make obligatory to speak openly against them in every Sermon and stages about thier devil's Akida and beat them till death.....Ameen

    ReplyDelete
  10. Ashraf Ali Thanvi, Rashid Ahmed Gangohi, Khalil Ahmed Ambethwi, and Qassim Nanotwi are some not all of Ulema e deoband but part of them. So they don't represent all Deobandis and not all Deobaandis believe what they have said.
    A true Muslim only and only believe what Allah and his true and last Prophet Muhammad SAW has said and what was practiced by Khulaaf e Rasheedin.

    So believing or not believing in them or as a matter of fact any Alim of any maslak says doesn't matter. If it matches with Quran and Hadith then believe it and it it doesn't just reject it. There were no Dubandi or Brelvis existed at the time of Prophet Mohammad. They can and/or any Alim can make errors and I can see they have made mistake. One important thing which these Ulema missed is they lacked any proof from Quran & Hadith.

    ReplyDelete